Vacuum and Light quanta.

socratus

======= .
1.
Now the physicists think that Vacuum as
an Absolute Reference Frame in a state of T=2,7K
( after big bang). But if somebody belief in “ big bang”,
he must take in calculation that T=2,7K expands and
therefore the T=2,7K is temporary parameter and with
time it will go to T= 0K.
2.
The ‘Theory of Ideal Gas’ speculate with temperature parameter T=0K.

Question.
Can ‘Theory of Ideal Gas’ be model of Vacuum ?
================== .

socratus

Conservation ??? Transformation ???

jerrygg38 wrote on 23/06/2009 :
The Heisenbery uncertainty principle shows that linear momentum
is not conserved. The reason is that at any interaction linear momentum
can transform into angular momentum. However my dot-waves also
oscillated from a radius to the Plank radius. The contraction and
expansion of the dot-wave either in a plane surface or a spherical
surface I call spherical momentum.
Therefore in order to conserve momentum and agree with the
Heisenbergy principle, it is clear that one solution is that the total sum
of all momentums is constant,
Therefore when two dot-waves interact or two particles interact,
we cannot tell what direction the particles will go within the uncertainty.
A photon can enter the electron, the energy of the photon becomes
part of the energy level of the electron.
However the momentum is not guaranteed.
#
My comment.
#
jerrygg38
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle shows that linear momentum
is not conserved.
====.
S.
!!!
========== .
jerrygg38
The reason is that at any interaction linear momentum
can transform into angular momentum.
========== .
S.
And vice versa.
=============== .
jerrygg38
However my dot-waves also oscillated from a radius to the Plank radius.
========= .
S.
Is it possible to say what this process goes around the Plank radius ?
========== .
jerrygg38
The contraction and expansion of the dot-wave either in a plane
surface or a spherical surface I call spherical momentum.
======== .
S.
Is this process goes around the Plank radius (spherical surface ) ?
Is this spherical momentum connected with spherical surface ?
========= .
jerrygg38
Therefore in order to conserve momentum and agree with the
Heisenberg principle, it is clear that one solution is that the total
sum of all momentums is constant,
========== .
S.
Something here is wrong.
Why?
You say:
1.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle shows that linear momentum
is not conserved.
2.
The reason is that at any interaction linear momentum
can transform into angular momentum.

It means that according to Heisenberg principle neither linear
momentum nor angular momentum are constant parameters.
But you try to conserve momentum.
Why?
Is it because from school we were studied about the law
of momentum’s conservation, energy conservation . . etc ?

And then you say: ‘it is clear that one solution is that the total
sum of all momentums is constant,’.

But the law is named :
" The law of conservation and transformation energy / mass"
And nobody in the school taught us : ‘What does the Law of
Transformation energy / mass means according to one single
quantum of light or to one single electron ?’
============= .
jerrygg38
Therefore when two dot-waves interact or two particles interact,
we cannot tell what direction the particles will go within the uncertainty.
===== .
S.
In my opinion the Heisenberg principle shows that particles
can have different momentums.
========= .
jerrygg38
A photon can enter the electron, the energy of the photon becomes part
of the energy level of the electron.
======= .
S.
Questions:
Can photon and electron be one and the same particle
in different conditions ?
Can the difference between photon and electron depends
only from frequency ?
Answer:
May 23, 2009.
I think not just frequency, but phasing and polarity will differ.

David M. Rountree, AES
Scientific Paranormal Investigative
Research Information and Technology
www.spinvestigations.org

So.
Not just frequency, phasing , polarity but momentum also
will be differ when electron ( or photon) changes its behavior.
=============================== . . .
jerrygg38
However the momentum is not guaranteed.
====== .
S.
However the conversation of momentum (as well as frequency,
phasing , polarity and charge ) is not guaranteed and is not
constant parameter .
========== .
#
From an email.
Since linear momentum and angular have different units,
I don't understand how one can transform into the other.
/ R. . . . PhD /
=== . .
So: continuation.
#
jerrygg38 wrote:
Therefore in order to conserve momentum and agree with the
Heisenberg principle, it is clear that one solution is that the total
sum of all momentums is constant,
======= .
S.
We have two momentums:
linear momentum and angular momentum ( maybe more).
And jerrygg38 says:
‘ that the total sum of all momentums is constant,’.
How it was saying simply . . ‘ sum of all momentums ‘ !!!

Ones Sir Arthur Eddington said:
We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two,
because one and one are two. We are finding
that we must learn a great deal more about `and '.

In others words, when we have one linear momentum
and one angular momentum that we must learn a great
deal more about `sum’. Because ‘sum’ must be some Law,
which connected the ‘one’ and ‘ one’ to ‘sum’.
============ .
Regards.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

socratus

What is the nature of Light Quanta ?
In my opinion this question is similar to other one:
How can the SRT be understood ?

More than 100 years have passed when SRT was created
but the discussions about it are still going on .

I suggest my own opinion about SRT (Light Quanta & Vacuum)
=== .

One of the SRT laws says:
The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant
equal to : c=1. No other particles can reach such speed.
If all the other particles cannot reach this seed it means
they are absolutely different particles. Their abilities
are absolutely another. And if they absolutely different,
so we cannot compare them. From our school days
we know that to compare two incommensurable quantities
is not possible.
It is the same as to compare the elephant and the whale.
We can see the elephant in the safari and the whale in the
ocean. But we cannot meet them together in the same
reference frame.
Therefore I say the SRT is theory about Light Quanta.

Once again:
The speed of Light Quanta in the Vacuum is constant
equal to : c=1. In the Vacuum !!!
The conditions of safari created the geometrical form of elephant.
The conditions of ocean created the geometrical form of the whale.
Then we must suppose that the conditions of Vacuum have the
influence on the geometrical form of Light Quanta.

Question: What are the conditions of Vacuum ?
1.
The matter ( and its density) in the Universe is very small.
This small mass cannot roll the Universe into sphere therefore
the Universe must be infinite.
2.
This infinite space is Kingdom of Cold.
Now it is considered that the temperature of this Kingdom
is: T= 2,7K. But this quantity is not constant, it is relative
and decreases, and in the future will reach T= 0K.
and the laws of thermodynamics say: the particles in the
Kingdom of Cold (T= 0K) cannot have volume. It means
they are flat particles. And from all flat geometrical forms
the most symmetrical is circle: c/d= pi = 3,14 ……
3.
According to Quantum Theory the Vacuum is some kind
of energetic space, it means the particles, the Light Quanta
are also some kind of energetic power.

All discussions are tautology without understanding what Vacuum is.

So, in my opinion, the Quantum of Light is some kind of
energetic particle with flat geometrical form of circle.
But if the Quantum of Light always moves only with constant
speed c=1, then, it seems, it is a mad particle. Thinking in such
way it is hard to understand its importance in our life.
But SRT helps us to understand that this view on the Quantum
of Light is wrong. The SRT says: its laws depend on the movement
of the Quantum of Light.
Once again.
The SRT laws (Lorentz transformation ) explain us how the behaviour
( movement ) of the Quantum of Light changes.
The theory says : in the movement
a) the mass and energy of Quantum of Light changes.
b) the geometrical form (circle) of Quantum of Light changes
c) the time of its life changes.
(according to Lorentz transformation )
==== .
Best wishes
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1372
===================== . .

socratus

What is the nature of h-bar ?

In my peasant opinion the " photon" is a particle ( h ),
or a " noun.", who can act as a " verb."
It means photon ( as a " noun." ) can produce wave length
acting ( as a " verb." ), according to formula E =h*f,
where h* is corpuscular, who has spin h/2pi.
The spin h/2pi means the particle rotates around its axis.

Now I can clearly understand and read the formula E =h*f :
The particle ( h ) rotate around of its axis ( h* = 2pi )
is action of frequency (f) which make up energy (E ).

As result of this action is possible to detect electrical
wave length in surroundings .
== .
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus.
==== .
http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1372
===================== . .

leejane30

quanta?
what is that?
is it a star or a phenomenon on the space?

halane34

mo se considera que Newton / leyes de Einstein
de la gravitación son la base de la física, las primeras leyes del Universo.
Pero la masa de material detectado de la materia en el Universo
es tan pequeña (la densidad media de todas las sustancias en la
Universo es de aproximadamente p = 10 ^ -30 g / m ^ 3) que la gravedad
campo, como un todo, está roto, no funciona, como un todo, en el Universo.
Así, el Newton / leyes de gravitación de Einstein son correctas sólo
en la parte pequeña y local de Universo y no podemos tenerlas
como los primeros. ¿Qué puede hacer la primera ley del Universo, ser?

IVA debt advice

Wink

socratus

halane34
It is exactly that I want to say.
Thank you.
Happy New Year 2010.
All the best.

Israel Sadovnik Socratus
===.

Vacuum and Light quanta.

Forum Options