size of the universe

Anonymous · Guest Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:49 pm

i have read in quite a few journals in which thy talk about the size of the universe here we just exclude the expansion of the universe.
what i am curious about is how does the size of the universe can be determined. besides will it not shatter the conservation of energy theorem which states:- the total energy og the universe remains conserved.
because if universe has a limit then there is a boundry beyond which something must exist as is applicable to our logics.and if there is something beyond the boundry of the universe and the universe and'it' exchange energies the how can we say that the energy of the universe remains constant?

Michael Turner

Interesting thoughts. I used to ask the same type of questions. Something doesn't add up and you just can't put your finger on exactly what is going on.
In a unique way this is your answer. Nothing exists outside of matter. Space itself is the lowest form of matter being generated by mass as a point of origin mass to energy transfer to the gravitational wave- which = space itself.
Mass( 3D )= Space ( a process aligning to two dimensions ) divided by
the speed of the transfer of energy squared. Look at Geometry
Area= Pi times r squared and look at relativity E= m times c squared. now assume a fundimental law of physics has been missed. F
Free matter( the gravitational wave, space) = Bound matter( mass ) times the speed of the unbinding ( ie- the speed of gravity, 1.06 times the speed of light) squared. I know it is a lot to say in a little space. Now in anal terms it involves three to two dimensional tensor equations and resonance wavelength equations but this is enough for a while.

ma1999

Or one could say is the only way to answer that question without accounting for limitless. Or rather as long as mass moves "outwards" more space is created out of nothing.
This nothing must be definition be limitless since if it has a border there must be something else.

Does creating space out of nothing account for creating dimentions also ??

Michael Turner

You misunderstand and you do not apply scientific fact to your explainations.
Example; Time and space are relative due to motion, a bland summery of Einstein's theories of relativity. This is possible due to mass decaying into the gravitational wave and time and space are functions of this wave. Time is the process of decay and space is the resulting continiously enlarging area. If you could assume, just for the sake of argument, that this is true - Time, space, and gravitational wave synchronization are resulting descriptions of actions of this process then predictions can be made. Prediction #1- Force equals mass times acceleration would apply and since the force is constant in this theory and mass is decreasing then acceleration of the entire universe would increase. This has been proven.
Prediction#2- The Universe is flattening as overall gravitational wave synchronization aligns the waves- new concept of gravity based on this shortened version of the theory which is 30,000 words. Prediction#3 -
Time and space work as dopler- like principles since like sound they are functions of a wave. Be mad at me all you want but i have worked it all out just because I could not stand not knowing. It is nice to know that the Universe exists and can be explained in three dimensions realizing that even Newton and Einstein missed the fundimental process. Gravitation@cfl.rr.com for the whole paper.

size of the universe

Forum Options

Register