|
Started by
|
Message
|
neil russell
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:13 am
Joined: 23 Jul 2009 Posts: 1
|
|
Black Holes are not forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you believe as I do that the universe is infinite, then a black hole cannot be forever, in effect it will act as the recycle bin of the universe. It is assumed that the escape velocity of a black hole is the speed of light as light is not seen to escape from a black hole. A much simpler explanation could be that the matter in a black hole is collapsed down to a level below which light (photons) no longer are created, hence no light emitted. There is support for this idea in that the Subaru observatory in Japan have found what they describe as an exploding galaxy where hydrogen clouds have been detected exploding out at half the speed of light from the galaxys centre core.
An explanation could be that when a black hole spins up to half light speed, its escape velocity?, it will spin off matter which will reform as hydrogen. This would explain why galaxies are spiral shaped ( observe a catherine wheel firework in action)
What do you reckon folks?
|
|
jingle33
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:03 am
Joined: 24 Aug 2009 Posts: 2
|
|
|
|
Complex but informative. 
|
|
vantheo
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:27 pm
Joined: 21 Oct 2009 Posts: 3
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Black holes can not be destroyed they are in our universe, good research.
|
|
Galaxy
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 5:50 pm
Joined: 29 Jan 2010 Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
If dark energy takes off in two opposite directions, each having an idea in it of the beginning place, then at a certain place, a pull would be created, causing the sides to pull in and twist. The gravitational pull at the beginning place, and the stress of the dark energy continuing out, this intense pulling could pull in the sides and cause a pull and twisting, and create a Black Hole.
Also, the energy would be held at a place by the pull from the beginning, creating quite a force. The energy could continue out to a side, another Black Hole could be created, with an idea in it of the first one and the second Black Hole could end up pulling the first Black Hole into itself.
Everything has what was in it before, so there is an active memory in just about everything.
This is a more simple, logical way of explaining something, like a BH.
|
|
peterfedric
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:38 am
Joined: 16 Feb 2010 Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Its a very great theory regarding the black hole.A black hole is defined by the escape velocity that would have to be attained to escape from the gravitational pull exerted upon an object. It showed that particle–antiparticle pairs generated at a black hole’s periphery, known as its event horizon, would be separated. One would fall into the black hole while the other would escape, making the black hole appear as a radiating body.
|
|
Lydia
Site Admin
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:27 pm
Joined: 03 Feb 2004 Posts: 645
|
|
Our Resident Black Hole is called Sagittarius A
|
|
|
|
|
|
I reviewed a very interesting and educational book by Fulvio Melia last year. You can read about it in the Articles ( Reviews) section on this website.
The book addresses all inquiries and research on the subject. I recommend it for your library.
LL/
|
|
barry.armstead
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 1:37 pm
Joined: 06 Jul 2006 Posts: 167 Location: canberra
|
|
|
|
Hi Folks.
This thread seems a bit mixed.
The original poster is theorising that a matter could eventually escape a black hole if it spins fast enough.
My understanding is that black holes are not such complicated beasts. There is no magic doorway, there is no "Other dimension" that they go to. They don't form "wormholes".
If a star is massive enough, let's say for example, 100 times the size of our sun. The energy produced by fusion creates pressure, pushing the stars mass and matter outward. It's own weight (mass) provides gravity to pull its mass and matter in.
For a time, there is equilibrium and the star becomes stable.
If, however, the star starts to run out of energy to provide that stabilizing pressure, eventually gravity wins and squeezes all that star's matter.
Gravity goes mad and finally the star is crushed into a single point called a singularity. It is smaller than microscopic - i.e. it has mass(weight) but NO SIZE.
Remember, this star now is not putting out the heat and light energy and although it has reduced in volumetric size, it is still exactly the same weight.
It has exactly the same gravitational influence on it's surroundings as it did when it was a star. If you fly too close and too slow, you will get pulled in and added to it's mass (weight).
The matter that gets pulled in doesn't go anywhere, it just gets squashed and squeezed onto the singularity.
Like I said, they are pretty simple beasts.
|
|
Swenz.john
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:27 pm
Joined: 19 Nov 2010 Posts: 10
|
|
|
|
|
No its not that mixed as you think barry. As peter fedric has last posted about the anti matter theory , this was introduced by stephen hawking, aren't you aware of the hawking's radiation. It works like this, he said that universe is made up of matter and its anti matter. Eventually they are made up for anhilating each other, but at the event horizon one of the particles are sucked in, and the other self is emitted outside. These emitted one's are known as hawking's radiation. Where as you my friend barry are describing the birth of a black hole.
|
|
|
|